The Editor’s Desk: The backlash begins

The international outpouring of funds to restore Notre Dame is not applauded by everyone

Well, that didn’t take long, did it?

I’m referring to the swift change in the narrative surrounding the pledges to rebuild and restore Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris following the fire that devastated the 850-year-old building on April 15. Paris firefighters were still working to extinguish the blaze when a prominent French business conglomerate pledged €100 million (Cdn$150 million) towards restoration of the cathedral, an amount that was soon matched and/or surpassed by others. Within a few days more than €1 billion (Cdn$1.5 billion) had been raised.

That’s a good thing, right? It’s an example of people rallying to show support for one of the world’s great treasures, and ensure that the cathedral is here for another 850 years, a bastion of beauty and peace and comfort even for those with no personal religious affiliation. It’s a classic feel-good story, an inspiring tale, a concrete message of faith, hope, and charity (and remember that the King James version of 1 Corinthians 13: 13 tells us that of these three things, the greatest is charity).

Goes to show how wrong you can be. Almost as quickly as support for Notre Dame sprang up, there were people ready, able, and more than willing to pour scorn on it. “It’s a good thing these wealthy people donated money but it does beg the question why they don’t do something to address social problems like poverty and homelessness,” said Bruno Cautrès of Cevipof, the political research centre at the Paris School of International Affairs. “We should first thank them, then hope they ask themselves this question.”

M. Cautrès was remarkably restrained in comparison with many others, but the common message was the same. Why were some of France’s largest and wealthiest businesses — along with countless smaller organizations, not to mention individuals from around the world — falling over themselves to throw money at restoring a bunch of stones (and religious ones at that, some added, in a rabbit hole we won’t venture down), when there are homeless people, and children living in poverty, and fatal diseases in search of a cure?

Many people were (very vocally) of the opinion that buildings should not come before human beings. The money raised to restore Notre Dame would be better off spent helping the homeless and the poverty-stricken, or used to improve education, or fund health care research. Why, came the cri de coeur, did so many seem to value an old building more than they valued their fellow human beings?

I don’t think it’s a question of what one does and does not value. In Canada alone there are more than 85,000 registered charities, so those who want to donate need to make decisions. If a person chooses, for example, to donate to the Heart and Stroke Foundation, but not to the Canadian Cancer Society, does that mean she doesn’t care about those with cancer?

“But at least that money is going to help people!” I hear someone cry, “it’s not going just to restore a building!” Agreed. But people will donate to a cause that touches their heart or their life in some way; they cannot be compelled to donate to a cause that someone else finds more “acceptable”, and there’s a good chance that much of the money being pledged to help Notre Dame would not otherwise have been pledged to go anywhere other than into someone’s bank account.

And the harsh truth is that homelessness, to use one example, is a hugely complex issue with many factors contributing to it, for which there is no easy or simple solution that just needs sufficient funding in order to make things right. Human beings don’t always do complexity very well, so given the choice between donating to alleviate homelessness (where does the money go? who does it help, and in what way? how, if at all, will this “fix” homelessness? how can I see this result?) and donating to help restore Notre Dame — a fairly simple goal which will have a very visible outcome — simplicity often wins the day.

Don’t fault people for that, otherwise we might end up with no one donating to anything for fear of incurring the wrath of others for making the “wrong” choice. Donate what you can, where you can. No one should ask for more.

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

High tech fish transport system set up to ‘whoosh’ salmon past Big Bar landslide

Fish will spend about 20 seconds inside the system, moving at roughly 20 metres per second

Clinton RCMP seek assistance in Canoe Creek hit and run

A pedestrian was sent to hospital with serious injuries after vehicle failed to stop

A second wave of COVID-19 is probable, if history tells us anything

B.C.’s top doctor says that what health officials have learned this round will guide response in future

Hungry hawk versus reluctant rattler showdown caught on camera

Not the first time photographer was in right place at right time to document an unusual encounter

BC Ferries losing up to $1.5 million each day as pandemic tanks ridership

The company does not qualify for the wage subsidy

COVID-19: B.C. church services resume with public health limits

Maximum 50 in large spaces, Premier John Horgan says

Chilliwack school board censures trustee Barry Neufeld after controversial Facebook post

Board chair issues statement on censure but little else regarding Facebook post controversy

Twenty-nine of Canada’s 48 national parks to reopen to day-use visitors June 1

All national parks, historic sites and marine conservation areas have been closed for weeks

JK Rowling publishes first chapters of new story online

Book will be a fairy tale for kids and benefit those particularly affected by the pandemic

BC Corrections to expand list of eligible offenders for early release during pandemic

Non-violent offenders are being considered for early release through risk assessment process

Fraser Valley driver featured on ‘Highway Thru Hell’ TV show dies

Monkhouse died Sunday night of a heartattack, Jamie Davis towing confirmed

B.C. visitor centres get help with COVID-19 prevention measures

Destination B.C. gearing up for local, in-province tourism

Most Read